Jesse J. Camacho

Representative matters

A selection of publicly reported matters, grouped by technology. The story of how matters are run is on the work page; a docket is only the visible part of it.

Authentication & notification

Twilio v. TeleSign, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

U.S. Patent 7,945,034. Obviousness assertions against a fraud-detection process based on a user's telephone number, rejected by the Board.

TeleSign v. Twilio, Central District of California

U.S. Patents 7,945,034; 8,462,920; 8,687,038; 9,300,792. Also defended three inter partes reviews.

StrikeForce v. PhoneFactor; StrikeForce v. Microsoft, District of Delaware

U.S. Patents 7,870,599; 8,484,698; 8,713,701. Out-of-band authentication.

SimpleAir v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas

U.S. Patents 7,035,914; 6,021,433.

Cryptography, encoding & security

Princeton Digital v. Microsoft, District of Delaware

U.S. Patent 4,813,056.

Tallgrass v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas

Addison Fischer Patents 5,346,972; 6,141,423; 6,216,229.

Pantaurus v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas

U.S. Patent 6,272,533.

Communications, email & imaging

Comcast v. Sprint, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

U.S. Patent 5,991,271.

InNova v. Cinemark, Eastern District of Texas

U.S. Patent 6,018,761.

E-contact v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Texas

U.S. Patent 5,347,579.

Skyline v. Microsoft, Eastern District of Virginia

U.S. Patent 7,551,172.

Chemical

Buckman v. Solenis, Western District of Tennessee

U.S. Patents 8,841,469; 8,962,059. Argued at the Federal Circuit; the oral argument is in the court's public recordings.

Buckman v. Nalco, Northern District of Illinois

U.S. Patents 7,949,432; 8,012,758; 7,981,679.

Trademark

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Defended a fashion company against a cancellation proceeding; pursued an opposition on behalf of a non-profit.

Source: matters as publicly listed on the Practus, LLP profile. Roles and outcomes are matters of public record; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.